Analysis of Leading Sectors in East Kalimantan In 2018-2022 As a Potential for Advanced Indonesia

Maya Nur Cholida, Firsty Ramadhona Amalia Lubis, Agus Salim

Abstract


An increase in the regional economy can be obtained when there is a competitive advantage in the sector in the region. The economic sector can potentially improve the economy when the financial sector is classified as a primary sector. This sector is highly competitive and has a fast growth rate. The novelty that distinguishes this research is to analyze the sector in the area that is the location of IKN development. This research aims to determine the primary economic sector, sectors with fast growth rates and high competitiveness, and sectors categorized as developed sectors in the financial sector in East Kalimantan in 2018-2022. This research applies quantitative data from the Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) value of East Kalimantan and the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) value of Indonesia in 2018-2022 sourced from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS). The method used in this study uses the Location Quotient (LQ) data analysis model, Shift Share (SS), and Klessen Typology analysis. The results of this study state that there is only one primary sector in East Kalimantan, namely the Mining and Quarrying sector. Meanwhile, the sector with the fastest growth rate is the Health Services and Social Activities sector, and the dominating sector in East Kalimantan is the Mining and Quarrying sector. Thus, superior sectors in East Kalimantan can be an impetus to increase per capita income and minimize unemployment to support the realization of Advanced Indonesia.


Full Text:

PDF

References


A’yun, I. Q., Vianti, W. O., & Zainal, Z. (2022). Determinants of Original Local Government Revenue (PAD) Case Studies of 34 Provinces in Indonesia. JAMPE (Journal of Asset Management and Public Economy), 1(2), 35–46.

Ardina D.R, dkk. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Transformasi Struktural Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di Indonesia Tahun 2001-2018. Paradigma Multidisipliner, 1(1), 13–21. http://smkn1magelang.sch.id/jpm/index.php/jpm/article/view/1/1

Arsyad, L. (2015). Ekonomi Pembangunan dan Pembangunan Ekonomi. Ekonomi Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, 05(01), 1–37.

Basuki, M., & Mujiraharjo, F. N. (2017). Analisis Sektor Unggulan Kabupaten Sleman dengan Metode Shift Share dan Location Quotient. Jurnal Sains, Teknologi Dan Industri, 15(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.4103/2276‑7096.188531

Iverson, B. L., & Dervan, P. B. (n.d.). No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における 健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title. 7823–7830.

Juhanis. (2012). Pengaruh Sektor Unggulan Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Wilayah Kabupaten Halmahera Selatan. Jurnal Plano Madani, I(1), 16–28.

Juniarta, T., & Khoirudin, R. (2023). Analisis Potensi Ekonomi dan Sektor Unggulan Kabupaten / Kota di Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. 06.

Karmini, K., Saroyo, S., Karyati, K., Widiati, K. Y., Widuri, N., & Sulichantini, E. D. (2022). Sektor Unggulan Di Kabupaten Kutai Barat Dan Kontribusinya Dalam Penyerapan Tenaga Kerja Di Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Riset Pembangunan, 5(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.36087/jrp.v5i1.114

Kustanto, A. (2020). Buletin Studi Ekonomi. Vol. 25 No. 1, Februari 2020. Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Regional Di Indonesia: Peran Infrastruktur, Modal Manusia Dan Keterbukaan Perdagangan, 25(1), 22–40. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/bse/article/view/55427

Mahrita, Mintarti, S., & Fitriadi. (2016). Analisis Sektor Ekonomi Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. INOVASI : Jurnal Ekonomi Keuangan, Dan Manajemen, 12(2), 235–249. http://journal.feb.unmul.ac.id

Mahrus Lutfi Adi Kurniawan, N. P. (2014). Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Dan Penentuan Titik Ambang Batas Inflasi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Studi Pembangunan, 15(April), 72–77. https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/esp/article/view/1263/1319

Nafisah, E. F., & Sukarniati, L. (2015). Impact on Development of Tourism in Gunungkidul Regency To Economic Conditions of Community Around. Bisnis & Ekonomi, 13(2), 105–115.

Risdiantanti, Z. (2019). Analisis Potensi Ekonomi Sektoral Sebagai Sektor Unggulan Di Wilayah Provinsi Kalimantan Timur Periode 2014-2018. 1, 105–112.

Salim, A., & Suripto, S. (2023). Does prudential capital reduce bank risk-taking? Empirical evidence from the Indonesian banks industry. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 24(1), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.v24i1.17696

Suripto, Firmansyah, & Sugiyanto, F. X. (2020). Poverty viewed from the perspective of domestic production in Yogyakarta: The Solow growth model approach. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 24(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2020.105166

Suripto, & Subayil, L. (2020). Pengaruh Tingkat Pendidkan, Pengangguran, Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Dan Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Terhadap Kemiskinan Di D.I.Yogyakarta Priode 2010-2017. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Pembangunan, 1(2), 127.

Tumangkeng, S. (2018). Analisis Potensi Ekonomi Di Sektor Dan Sub Sektor Pertanian, Kehutanan Dan Perikanan Kota Tomohon. Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi, 18(1), 12.

Yuniarti, D., & Sukarniati, L. (2021). Penuaan Petani dan Determinan Penambahan Tenaga Kerja di Sektor Pertanian. Agriekonomika, 10(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.21107/agriekonomika.v10i1.9789

Zakiyyah, N. A. A., Lubis, F. R. A., & Wahyuni, I. (2023). Determinants of poverty in Indonesia. Eko-Regional: Jurnal Pembangunan Ekonomi Wilayah, 18(2), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.24197/st.2.2021.243-267


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publihser:
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Editorial Address:
Yogyakarta

This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0