Perbedaan Subjective Well-Being di Masa Pandemi Ditinjau pada Wilayah Tempat Tinggal Masyarakat Kabupaten Bangkalan

Fandi Rosi Sarwo Edi, Lailatul Muarofah Hanim

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to find out the difference in subjective well-being in the pandemic period reviewed in the area where the people of Bangkalan Regency live. Research methods use a quantitative approach. The research location is in Bangkalan Regency which includes two sub-districts including, Bangkalan Subdistrict and Tanjung Bumi District. Total sampling of 200 people, with subject characteristics, namely; (1) KTP in accordance with the location of the research subdistrict, and (2) aged over 16 years. The collection of subjective well-being was conducted using the subjective well-being scale of Diener & Larsen (2008) with the highest coefficient values of 0.496 and the lowest of 0.250. Reliability test obtained a value of 0.814.  Based on the results of independent tests t-test samples obtained Sig values. (2-tailed) of 0.000 < 0.05, then H0 was rejected and Ha accepted, thus it can be concluded that there is a significant difference between subjective well-being communities in Tanjung Bumi District and the community in Bangkalan Subdistrict.


Keywords


Subjective well-being, Bangkalan Society, Pandemic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Awad, F. B., & Mayasari, R. (2015). Subjective Well-Being , Psychological WellBeing , and Islamic Religiosity. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 4(12), 1168–1173.

Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 34-43. PsycARTICLES.

Diener, E., & Seligman, M.E.P. (2002). Very Happy People.Psychologicalscience, 13, 81-84.

Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2005). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), The handbook of positive psychology (pp. 63–73). New York [N.Y.]: Oxford University Press.

Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). The envolving concept of subjective well-being : the multifaceted nature of happiness. Advances in Cell Aging and Gerontology Vol. 15, pages 187-219. DOI: 10.1016/S1566- 3124(03)15007-9.

Eid, M. & Larsen, R. J. (2008). The Science of Subjective Well-Being. New York: The Guilford Press.

Mendieta- Hombrados, I., Garcia-Martin, M.A & Gomez-Jacinto, L. (2012). The relationship between social support, loneliness, and subjective well being in aspanish sampek from a multimediasional perspective. Soc Indic Res. DOI: 10.10007/s11205-012-0187-5.

Nayana, Firra Noor. (2013). Kefungsian Keluarga Dan Subjective Well-Being Pada Remaja. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan.

Suryani, Rina. (2021). Student Psychological Well-Being Plays Dual Roles During the Pandemic Covid-19. Biblio Couns : Jurnal Kajian Konseling dan Pendidikan Vol. 4, No. 2. hlm. 108-113.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.