THE IMAGE OF INDONESIA IN THE G20 PRESIDENCY ON THE RUSSIA-UKRAINE CONFLICT: A PRAGMATIC APPROACH

Irwan Suswandi, Intan Rawit Sapanti, Angga Trio Sanjaya

Abstract


Indonesia has been elected for the first time in the G20 Presidency.  Shortly after being elected to the presidency holder, a big challenge arose which was the re-emergence of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. This situation forced Indonesia to appear as the leader of the world’s major economic countries. In this G20 Presidency, Indonesia has also built an image that is expected to help resolve the Russia-Ukraine conflict. This analytical descriptive research aimed to analyze the image of Indonesia in the G20 Presidency on the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The approach used was a pragmatic approach, with speech act theory from Austin (1962) and Searle (1969), and image building theory from Lozier (1976). The data collection method chosen was the note-taking method with the data analysis technique was the pragmatic identity method. The data source for this research was an official speech video of President Joko Widodo responding to the Russia-Ukraine conflict which was obtained on the YouTube channel “Sekretariat Presiden”. The data collected were 13 utterances that contained the image of Indonesia on the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Based on the results of the analysis, the image of Indonesia through Joko Widodo’s speech was built through illocutionary meaning. The illocutionary meaning produces 8 (eight) images of Indonesia, namely committed, proactive, neutral, humanist, peace-loving, solutive, progressive, and responsible. The image of Indonesia on the Russia-Ukraine conflict was built as a form of the existence of Indonesia which is now the G20 Presidency. This image is principle for Indonesia as the holder of the G20 Presidency to influence the world to build peace.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Atok, F. (2017). Analisis Konflik Rusia Dan Ukraina (Studi Kepustakaan Status Kepemilikan Krimea). Jurnal Poros Politik, 11–15.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Thing with Word. Oxford University Press.

DeLozier, M. W. (1976). The Marketing Communication Process. McGraw-Hill Kogakushu, Ltd.

Felani, H. (2017). Citra Indonesia dalam Film dan Serial Televisi Hollywood. Jurnal Komunikasi, 11(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol11.iss2.art1

Helaludin, & Wijaya, H. (2019). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Sekolah Tinggi Theologia Jaffray.

Rahardi, R. K. (2019). Pragmatik: Konteks Intralinguistik dan Konteks Ekstralinguistik. Amara Books.

Searle, J. (1969). Speect Act: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Sanata Dharma University Press.

Tobing, G. K. M., Nurhidayah, R. P., & Andrea Brigitta, T. (2022). Dampak Presidensi G20 Terhadap Perekonomian Indonesia Pasca Pandemi Covid-19. 3(2), 134–153. http://fetrian.fisip.unand.ac.id/index.php/fetrian/article/download/250/46

Widiastuti, R., & Nurtanzila, L. (2018). Membaca Citra Indonesia Dalam Arsip Audio Visual Kementerian Pariwisata. Diplomatika: Jurnal Kearsipan Terapan, 2(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.22146/diplomatika.35300




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/sylection.v1i1.11533

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Contact person:
Mr. Thoyib +62 856 3015 058 
Mr. Resnery +62 852 7899 0181
Mrs. Tristanti +62 811 1773 473

Email:
muhammad.amali@comm.uad.ac.id