Conflict resolution between virtual Hotel Operator and MAKUTA Hotel using negotiation communication

Muhammad Arkaan Arief, Muhammad Najih Farihanto

Abstract


This research based on the problem, namely the lack of negotiation and conflict resolution from VHO to one of their client and the trust from client is keep decreasing, therefore the cooperations between two parties collapse. This research categorized as qualitative research using descriptive methods, and using case study which is the researcher is the key instrument, the data collection is using data triangulation technique, using interview results between all the parties involved. This research approach uses a qualitative approach with interview and field observation methods, the characteristic of data analysis is inductive. The purpose of this research is to answer the question why VHO failed to maintain the collaboration with their client. The result of this study indicates there is several variabels causing VHO failed to maintain their sharing economy business with their client, VHO breaking several aggrement with their client and leads to deadlock at negotiation between both parties, therefore their client decided to terminate the cooperation with VHO.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Khrisna, M. & Arreza, B. (2022). Virtual Hotel Operator (VHO) Affiliated Small Accommodation Business: A Comparison of Perceived Performance. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 15(1), 1-13.

Wahid, M. & Tualeka, N. (2017). Teori konflik sosiologi klasik dan modern. Al-Hikmah, 3(1), 32-48.

Isma, F. (2017). Efektivitas komunikasi negosiasi dalam bisnis. Komunike, 9(2), 105-122.

Uswan, R. (2001). Konflik dalam perspektif Komunikasi: Suatu Tinjauan Teoritis. Mediator, 2(1), 31-41.

Nugroho, A (2021). Teori utama sosiologi komunikasi (fungsionalisme struktural, teori konflik, interaksi simbolik) main theory of sociology communication (structural functionalism, conflict theory, symbolic interaction). Majalah Ilmiah Semi Populer Komunikasi Massa, 2(2), 185-194.

Nugroho, A. & Hati, S. (2020). Determinants of Repurchase Intention and Switching Intention: Analysis of Online Travel Agent, Peer-To-Peer Accommodation, and Virtual Hotel Operator Platforms, Market-Tržište, 32(1), 79-96.

Kupfer Schneider, A. & Lewicki, R. (2016). The Past and Future Challenges of Negotiation Theory. Ohio State Journal On Dispute Resolution, 31(1), 1-18.

Ramadhiana, I. & Prakarsa, G. (2021). User Acceptance of Virtual Hotel Operator Applications in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 115(1). 1-8.

Kusumawati, F. (2020). Virtual Hotel Operator Trends In Yogyakarta (OYO Hotel Case Study). Media Wisata, 18(1). 90-100.

Rao, R. Srinivasa. (2014). Emerging Trendsin Hospitality and Tourism. International Journal of Research Granthaalayah,1(1)

Ryan, C. (2015). Trends in HospitalityManagement Research: A Personaleflection. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(3). 340-361

Wiastuti, R.D & Susilowardhani, E.M.(2016). Virtual Hotel Operator: Is It Disruption for Hotel Industry? Jurnal Hospitality dan Pariwisata, 2(2).

Risqiadinda, L, & Indrawati. (2020). Variables Influencing the Purchase Decision towards OYO Rooms and Reddoorz. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 9(8), 17–22.

Satrya, I. D. G. (2023). Positive Aspect of Virtual Hotel Operator. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 4(4), 436-444.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/sylection.v3i1.14156

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Contact person:
Mr. Thoyib +62 856 3015 058 
Mr. Resnery +62 852 7899 0181
Mrs. Tristanti +62 811 1773 473

Email:
muhammad.amali@comm.uad.ac.id