Implementation of Article 53 of law no. 30 of 2014: Post Omnibus Law 2020

Muhammad Rizal Sirojudin, Anom Wahyu Asmorojati

Abstract


In law no. 30 of 2014 concerning government administration is a paradigm shift in the Indonesian state administrative court, one of which is the presence of the concept of a positive fictitious decision, precisely in article 53. However, after Law Number 11 of 2020 (Omnibus law) the implementing provisions and the phrase court ruling were removed. This is important because the implementing provisions and the phrase court ruling in the article are removed, so its implementation depends on the Presidential Decree promised by the Job Creation Law which until now has not existed. Therefore, the aim and urgency of this research is to understand the legal principles in accordance with the changes in existing regulations after the Omnibus Law / Job Creation Law. in addition,

In this scientific paper, the research method that the author uses is normative legal research or literature review. Based on the results obtained from the literature, the authors concluded that Supreme Court Regulation No. 8 of 2017 which regulates implementing provision for article 53 of Law No. 30 of 2014 before the Job Creation Law did not apply. Therefore, the Perpres / Presidential Decree promised in the Job Creation Law is very crucial.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


AISYAH, S. (2019). ANALISA YURIDIS PENINJAUAN KEMBALI ATAS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM PERKARA FIKTIF POSITIF YANG BERSIFAT FINAL DAN MENGIKAT (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 175 PK/TUN/2016). 2(2).

Anshori, A. G. (2018). Filsafat hukum. Ugm Press.

Arniti, N. K. A., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Suryani, L. P. (2019). Penyelesaian Permohonan Fiktif Positif untuk Mendapatkan Keputusan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 1(8), 265–270.

Aschari, M., & Harjiyatni, F. R. (2017). Jurnal Kajian Hukum. JURNAL KAJIAN HUKUM, 02(1), 25–57.

Chevalier, E. (2020). Silence in the French Administrative System: A Failed Revolution? https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45227-8_4

Cour Administrative d’Appel de Marseille, 8ème chambre, 29/01/2013, 11MA02224, (2013). https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/ceta/id/CETATEXT000027061596

Darmadi, H. (2020). APA MENGAPA BAGAIMANA PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN MORAL PANCASILA DAN PENDIDIKAN PANCASILA DAN KEWARGANEGARAAN (PPKn). An1mage.

Darwis, M. (2015). Di Kantor Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu Dan Penanaman Modal ( Kptsp & Pmd ) Kabupaten Mamuju Utara. 3, 97–105.

De Graaf, K. J., & Hoogstra, N. G. (2013). Silence is golden? Tacit authorizations in the Netherlands, Germany and France. Review of European Administrative Law, 6(2), 7–34.

Dragos, C. D., Kovač, P., & Tolsma, H. D. (2020). The Sound of Silence in European Administrative Law. In The Sound of Silence in European Administrative Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45227-8

Fitryantica, A. (2019). Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia melalui Konsep Omnibus Law. Gema Keadilan, 6(3), 300–316. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/gk/article/view/6751

Graaf, K. J. de, Hoogstra, N. G., & Marseille, A. T. (2020). Remedies Against Administrative Silence in the Netherlands. 179–212.

Heriyanto, B. (2019). Problematika Penyelesaian Perkara “Fiktif Positif” Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Palar | Pakuan Law Review, 5(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v5i1.1185

international monetary fund. (2020). Country Composition of WEO Groups. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2020/01/weodata/groups.htm#cee

Kovaˇc, P., Tolsma, H. D., & Dragos, D. C. (2020). In Search of an EffectiveModel: A Comparative Outlook on Administrative Silence in Europe.

Kuswandi. (2015). MODEL PENGELOLAAN SUMBER DAYA ALAM UNTUK SEBESAR- BESARNYA KEMAKMURAN RAKYAT. 1(2), 518–531.

Najib, E. A. (2020). No Title. youtube. https://youtu.be/DDMuWU_kBaE

Nurcahya, M. A., & Dewi, D. A. (2021). Implementasi Nilai Dasar Pancasila Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Tujuan Negara Abstrak. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(3), 631–639.

Nurhardianto, F. (2015). SISTEM HUKUM DAN POSISI HUKUM INDONESIA. 11(1), 283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24042/tps.v11i1.840

Prasetyo, E. (2021). (Mencari) Alternatif Fiktif Positif. https://rmol.id/read/2021/06/03/490485/mencari-alternatif-fikik-positif

Purwadi, A. D. and H. (2019). Actualization of Corrective Justice in Settling Cases of Government Silence action : Positive Fictitious Decisions in Indonesian Aris Darwanto Sebelas Maret University Surakarta , Indonesia Hari Purwadi Sebelas Maret University Surakarta , Indonesia Abstr. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 10(12), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v10n12p14

Rahman, F. (2020). Perbandingan Tujuan Hukum Indonesia, Jepang dan Islam. Khazanah Hukum, 2(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v2i1.7737

Rohaedi, E., & Basri, H. (2020). Implementation of Fictitious Positive Decision Case Settlement at Administrative Courts. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(11), 381–391.

Rumusan Lengkap Diskusi Undang - Undang Cipta Kerja. (2020). https://www.ptun-bandung.go.id/index.php?id=676#

Simanjuntak, E. (2017). Fictious Proceedings and Its Legal Problem. 379–398. https://doi.org/10.25216/JHP.6.3.2017.379-398

Taswin, W. (2021). Strategi Sukses menangani Perkara Perbuatan Melawan Hukum oleh Penguasa (Onrechmatig Overheids Daad - OOD) di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara PTUN. advokat alumni unsoed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnfxmrQToyo


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


E-ISSN: 2962-4460