THE COMPARISON OF USING MIND MAPPING AND KNOWLEDGE MAPPING TECHNIQUE TOWARD STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION IN REPORT TEXT AT THE ELEVENTH GRADE AT SMA N 1 TRIMURJO IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2015/2016

Defy Gustianing, Hadiyan Muhammad Hariz

Abstract


The objectives of this research are to know whether there is a difference result of reading comprehension by using mind mapping and knowledge mapping technique or not and to know which one is more effective technique between mind mapping and knowledge mapping technique.This research is a quantitative research.The design of this research is pre test-post test control group design which employs two groups. Experimentgroup is treated by mind mapping technique and control class is treated by knowledge mapping technique. Then, the total population is 123 students at the eleventh grade of SMA N 1 Trimurjo. The researcher takes 40 students, 20 students as experiment and20 as control. In taking the sample, the researcher used total cluster random sampling.The result of ttest is 2,91 and ttable  is 2,02 (on criterion 1) and 2,70 (on criterion 2). It means that tcount>ttable. So, there is a difference result of reading comprehension by using mind mapping and knowledge mapping technique and reading comprehension by using mind mapping technique is more effective than knowledge mapping technique.


Keywords


mind mapping technique, knowledge mapping technique, reading comprehension, report text

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arieta C. 2010. Reading Comprehension Overview. The Landmark College Guide. Ed, 1-5. Retrievied January, 10 2016 from http://Arieta.edu/ Reading to English Language Learners: A Reflective Guide /.

Balaid, Ali Saleh S. 2014. A Comprehensive Review of Knowledge Mapping Technique. Journal of Computing Research. 62.

Brown, Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principle. San Francisco: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Djamal, Murni., et al. 2006. Improving reading skill in English. Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Dock, Clarendon. 2007. Active learning and teaching methods for key stages

&2.Northern Ireland Curriculum : CCEA, 29.

Doddy, Ahmad., et al. 2008. Developing English Competencies. Jakarta : Pusat Perbukuan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Edinburg Gate England: Pearson Longman.

Jafari, Mostafa. (et. al.) 2009. A Framework For The Selection of Knowledge

Mapping Techniques. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice. Vol. 10, No. 1.

Miller, Debbie. 2010. Reading with Meaning, Teaching Comprehension in the

Primary Grades. England:Stenhouse Publisher.

Toi, H. 2009. Research on how Mind Map improves Memory. Paper presented

at the International Conference on Thinking. 1-72.

Turmudi, Dedi. 2013. Smart and Skilfull Writer, Steps to developing your live

writing skill 2. Metro: UMM Press.

Watthananon, J. 2012. Optimizing Knowledge Management using Knowledge

Map. American Educational Research. 32.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/utic.v1.159.2017

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

Kampus 4

Jl. Ringroad Selatan, Kragilan, Tamanan, Kec. Banguntapan, Bantul

Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55191, Indonesia

Email: utic@uad.ac.id


e-ISSN: 2775-6599


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

 

View My Stats