ASSESSMENT-BASED MATERIAL DEVELOPMENT: USING STUDENTS’ WORKS FOR DEVELOPING ENGLISH LEARNING MATERIAL

Kristiandi Kristiandi, Hefy Sulistyawati, Dewi Cahyaningrum

Abstract


Despite the vital role of teachers in delivering English instructions, English learning material takes the most prominent role in the learning process. As English learning process is expected to be learning centered, the role of English learning material becomes more strategic and crucial in fostering students’ learning. With the adopted curriculum as the framework and the concept of authentic materials as the basis, the development of English learning material needs to incorporate students’ learning problems and expectations. As such, teachers as learning facilitators are supposed to be alert to students’ needs for learning as well as their expectations and use them to update the learning materials as learning takes place. Students’ worksheets, which are the reflection of their current inter-language, are very good resource for teachers in developing a series of updated English learning materials and relevant communicative activities which are student-friendly. Developed on the revised Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach and Krashen’s Input Hypothesis, this paper highlights the importance of accommodating students’ learning problems for developing English learning materials by using formative and summative assessments results within a period of an English instructional program

Keywords


English learning material, assessment-based material, input hypothesis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Doughty, C., & Long, M. H. (2003). The handbook of second language acquisition. Blackwell publishing.

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of Second language acquisition (second ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elrbaum.

Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (1994). Second language acquisition: an introductory course. Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. Torrance, CA: Laredo Publishing Company.

Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching Grammar in Second Language Classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. New York: Routlege Publishing.

O’Malley, J. M., and Pierce L.V. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learning: Practical approaches for teachers. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

Patten, V. B., & Benati, A. G. (2010). Key terms in second language acquisition. Continuum international publishing group. London.

VanPatten, W, & Williams, J. (2007). Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New York.

White, L (1987). Against comprehensible input: The Input Hypothesis and the development of L2 competence. Applied linguistics, 8, 95-110.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/utic.v1.182.2017

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

Kampus 4

Jl. Ringroad Selatan, Kragilan, Tamanan, Kec. Banguntapan, Bantul

Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55191, Indonesia

Email: utic@uad.ac.id


e-ISSN: 2775-6599


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

 

View My Stats