Attribution theory in EFL teacher’s resistance of using technology

Nur Kamilah

Abstract


It is now a trend to research the teacher's perspectives of using technology in a language class. However, the reasons why teachers keep perspectives are not well studied. It is known in the view of naive psychology, that what a person regards something matters more than how it actually is.  To view success or failure, it is very humane to make excuses or reasons for how it happened. In the case of teacher’s reluctance of using technology in a language class, the present study aimed at explaining what could have underlain their resistance to using technology in their language classes, especially from the view of attribution theory. The study applied a qualitative approach using the phenomenology research design. The participants of the study were three high school language teachers from Situbondo, Indonesia. Added to the researcher as the primary research instrument were the interview and field notes. The findings of the study indicate that teachers have personally considered their resistance as something stable and uncontrollable. They believe that they become resistant because they do not have control over their ability as they believe the younger fellows are gifted with the ability to use IT fluently in the classroom. The findings imply that teachers are reluctant to use technology in the class because they fear failure when using technology in the classroom. It suggests that the magnitude of teachers’ attribution could determine what they could achieve in their professional development.


Keywords


risk-aversion; identities; perceived failure; Indonesia; Situbondo

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bloor, M., & Wood, F. (2006). Keywords in qualitative methods: A vocabulary of research concepts. London: SAGE.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd Ed.) White Plains. NY: Pearson Longman.

Fielden, L. V., & Rico, M. (2018). Attribution theories in language learning motivation: Success in vocational English for hospitality students. English Language Teaching, 11(11), 44-54.

Findley, M. J., & Cooper, H. M. (1983). Locus of control and academic achievement: A literature review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(2), 419.

Gosling, P. (1994). The attribution of success and failure: The subject/object contrast. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 9(1), 69.

Howard, S. K. (2013). Risk-aversion: Understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(3), 357-372.

Jager, L., & Denessen, E. (2015). Within-teacher variation of causal attributions of low achieving students. Social Psychology of Education, 18(3), 517-530.

Kamilah, N., & Anugerahwati, M. (2016). Factors contributing to teachers’ resistance in integrating ICT in EFL classroom in senior high school. ELLITE: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 1(2), 133–150.

Wang, H., & Hall, N. C. (2018). A systematic review of teachers’ causal attributions: Prevalence, correlates, and consequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2305.

Williams, M., & Robert, L. (1997). Burden: Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/utic.v2.5752.2019

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

Kampus 4

Jl. Ringroad Selatan, Kragilan, Tamanan, Kec. Banguntapan, Bantul

Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55191, Indonesia

Email: utic@uad.ac.id


e-ISSN: 2775-6599


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

 

View My Stats