The assessment of Indonesian EFL students' reading comprehension ability using Reading Evaluation and Decoding System (READS)

Indah Fajar Wahyuni

Abstract


This study focused on reading comprehension ability of the English Department students in answering READS, MCQ questions. READS is an alternative standardized assessment system that is capable of measuring reading comprehension ability. This is a descriptive study based on Barrett's Taxonomy levels, such as literal comprehension, reorganization, and inferential comprehension. This study consisted of 122 students of the English Department academic year 2015 through 2018 at one of the private universities in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. This study analysis utilized the three Barrett's taxonomy scales to identify whether the students were at meet the standard, below standard, above standard or at academic warning. Finding of the research indicated that 27.8 % students categorized into academic warning (Band 2 and 3), 46.7% students categorized into below standard (Band 4) and 25.5% students categorized into meet standard (Band 5). Consequently, READS as an alternative assessment will guide the teachers to design specific reading material based on students' needs.

Keywords


assessment; reading comprehension; Barrett's taxonomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Airasian, P.W, Mills, G. & Gay, L.R. (2012). Educational research: Compentencies for analysis and application. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Alderson J. C. &,‎ Urquhart, A.H. (1984). Reading in a foreign language (Applied linguistics and language study). London: Longman Pub Group.

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education, Inc.

Gay, L., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research competencies for analysis and application (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ Pearson International Edition.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practise of English language teaching third edition. New York: Pearson Education.

Hasyim, F. (2018). The effects of self-efficacy on motivation of reading English academic text . Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies, 5(1), 25-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/adjes.v5i1.8597

Johnson, B., & Turner, L. A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (1st ed.), 297- 319). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mohamed, A. R., Eng, L. S., & Ismail, S. A. M. M. (2010). Making Sense of reading scores with Reading Evaluation and Decoding System (READS). English Language Teaching, 3(3), 35-46.

Oakley, G (2011). The assessment of reading comprehension cognitive strategies: Practices and perceptions of Western Australian teachers. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34, 279-292

OECD (2017). Economic outlook for Southeast Asia, China and India 2017: Addressing energy challenges. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/saeo-2017-en

Pumfrey, P. D. (1977). Measuring reading abilities: Concepts, source, and application. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

Rosalina, E., & Nasrullah, N. (2020). The Correlation between self – esteem and student’s reading comprehension. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 2(2), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v2i2.1190

Snow, C. E.(2001). Reading for understanding: toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica: RAND Education Publisher.

Stanley, G., & Tognolini, J. (2011). A standards perspective on the relationship between formative and summative assessment. New Directions: Assessment and Evaluation. A collection of papers. British Council.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/utic.v2.5766.2019

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

Kampus 4

Jl. Ringroad Selatan, Kragilan, Tamanan, Kec. Banguntapan, Bantul

Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55191, Indonesia

Email: utic@uad.ac.id


e-ISSN: 2775-6599


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

 

View My Stats