The Students' Error Analysis of Writing in Recount Text for Millineal Students
Abstract
The result of this research shows that the total students’ error are 248 consist of omission 102 (41.10%), errors of addition 37 (14.90%), errors of substitution 77 (31.00%), and errors of permutation 32 (13.00%). The dominant errors made by the students is omission, while the lowest one is permutation.
Key Words: Milleneal Students, Error analysis, recount text, writing
Full Text:
PDF (132-138)References
N. Doghonazde, Teaching EFL reading and writing in Georgia. 2009.
T. Agustina, “Error Analysis in Writing Recount Text,” J. Lit. Linguist. English Teach., vol. 9, no. 18, pp. 81–89,
I. Ilmiah, “an Analysis of Gramatical Error in Writing Recount Text,” English Lit. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9–20, 2017.
H. Ardin, “Analyzing Errors In Recount Text Written By The Third Year Students Of SMAN 1 Pinrang,” JIKAP
PGSD J. Ilm. Ilmu Kependidikan, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1, 2017.
I. Nurhayati, “INTERLANGUAGE: GRAMMATICAL ERRORS ON STUDENTS’ RECOUNT TEXTS (A Case Study of First
Year of MAN 2 Banjarnegara in the Academic Year 2014/2015),” ELT Forum J. English Lang. Teach., vol. 4, no.
, pp. 1–6, 2015.
R. Nazalia, “An Error Analysis in Recount Text Writting Made by The Second Grade Students of SMP Muhammad Bandar
Lampung ( A Script ) By Rahma Nazalia,” 2017.
A. L. Iriana, “Analyzing Language Features of Recount Text Written by Ma Hidayatu Umam Students,” vol. 6, pp.
–37, 2018.
P. Kharmilah and D. Narius, “ERROR ANALYSIS IN WRITING DISCUSSION TEXT MADE BY STUDENTS AT ENGLISH
DEPARTMENT OF,” vol. 8, no. 3, 2019.
D. Ramli, “An Analysis On Students’ Errors In Writing Recount Text,” A Res. J., vol. 1, 2013.
G. S. Sitorus and K. Sipayung, “An Error Analysis of Using Phrases in Writing Recount Text at Tenth Grade in SMA
Parulian 2 Medan,” Celt A J. Cult. English Lang. Teach. Lit., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 74, 2018.
B. J. Waway, “AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT BASED ON SURFACE STRATEGY
TAXONOMY AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMA YP UNILA BANDAR LAMPUNG By Bulqis Jolay Waway TEACHER TRAINING AND
EDUCATION FACULTY,” pp. 0–12, 2013.
J. Harmer, “How to Teach English: An Introduction to the Practice of English Language Teaching. Edinburgh Gate:
Longman.” 2001.
H. D. Brown, “Teaching by Principles, Second Edition,” Teaching by Principles An Interactive Approach to Language
Pedagogy. 2007.
M. & P. J. Patel, English language teaching. 2008.
R. Cowan, “Cowan, R. (2008). The Teacher’s Grammar of English A Course Book and Reference Guide. New York
Cambridge University Press..pdf.” 2008.
R. Murphy, “English Grammar in Use. New York: Cambridge University Press.,” 2004.
R. Hartono, “Genres of Texts. Semarang: English Department Faculty of Language and Art Semarang State
University.,” pp. 9–10, 2005.
P. & M. W. Knapp, “Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies for Teaching and Assessing Writing. Sidney: University of New
South Wales Press.,” עלון הנוטע, vol. 66, pp. 37–39, 2005.
Priyana et al., Interlanguage: English for Senior High School Students X. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.,
no. 2001. 2008.
A. A. Khansir, “Error analysis and second language acquisition,” Theory Pract. Lang. Stud., vol. 2, no. 5, pp.
–1032, 2012.
J. C. Richards and R. Schmidt, Longman LANGUAGE T E A C H I N G & A P P L I E D LINGUIsTICs. 2010.
G. Yule, The Study of Language., vol. 66. 2010.
M. H. Keshavarz, “Contrastive Analysis and Error Analysis.,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2012.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.