The Implementation of Supreme Court Regulation No.4 of 2019 on Simple Claims Lawsuit Procedures during the Trial Process

Heniyatun Heniyatun, Bambang Tjatur Iswanto, Puji Sulistyaningsih, Dian Novita

Abstract


A simple, fast, and low-cost judiciary as stipulated Judicial Power regulation is expected that the settlement of the case can be resolved in a short and low cost. Currently, the Supreme Court has issued the Regulation on the procedure of settlement of simple claims. This article aims to analyses the implementation of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 4 of 2019 as amended of PERMA No.  2 of 2015 on the settlement of simple claims and identify obstacles in its implementation.  This research uses normative research with statute. The data sources used are primary and secondary data conducted with literature studies and interviews with respondents related to simple claims. Moreover, the data analyzed by qualitative descriptive method. The results showed that PERMA No. 4 of 2019 on The Procedure of Simple Lawsuit Settlement has been implemented by the District Court and the Religious Court of Magelang City and Magelang District, although not yet significantly implemented. This means that there are still courts that have not implemented the PERMA, this is because there are still many people who have not known about the simple claims. While that court did not suggest the defendant file this simple claims. The obstacles to the implementation of the PERMA are, first, the court calendar cannot run by the time that has been determined. Second, the absence of the defendant thus hinders the process of resolving the case. Third, the lack of carefulness of the clerk in classifying the incoming case is whether the lawsuit can be settled simply or a regular lawsuit. Fourth, the determined time limit was only 25 days, although the evidence has been done at the time of filing a lawsuit in the process of examining the case, the parties still have to do proof to seek justice as expected. Then the last one, the lack of socialization from the court to the defendant at the time of filing a lawsuit, as well as to the public that there is a simple procedure for settlement of the lawsuit.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amboro, Y. P., & Feryanto, O. (2016). Analisa Terhadap Efektivitas Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Batam). Journal of Judicil Review, 18(1), 141–158.

Asnawi, M. N. (2019). Hukum Acara Perdata : Teori, Praktik dan Permasalahannya di Peradilan Umum dan Peradilan Agama. UII Press.

Efendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. Prenadamedia Group.

Ferevaldy, A. P., & Anand, G. (2017). Kedudukan Hakim Tunggal Dalam Gugatan Sederhana (Small Claim Court). Jurnal ADHAPER, 3(2), 205–226.

Harviyan, S. A. (2021). Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana Sebagai Pelaksanaan Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan Untuk Mewujudkan Access To Justice. Jurnal Verstek, 9(3), 650–657.

Heniyatun, & Sulistyaningsih, P. (2018). Hukum Acara Perdata. UNIMMA PRESS.

Sakina, Krisnawati, D. N. R. A. P. dan I. G. A. A. A. (2018). Penerapan Penyelesaian Sengketa Dengan Gugatan Sederhana (Small Claim Court) Di Pengadilan Negeri (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar). Kertha Wicara, 7(4), 1–14.

Setiyawan, W. B. M., Utara, T. H., & Wulandari, F. D. (2019). Pembentukan Small Claim Court (SCC) sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat dan Biaya Ringan. Citizenship Jurnal Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 7(2), 72–81.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


E-ISSN: 2962-4460