A corpus-based analysis of central modal verbs in Kurikulum Merdeka’s textbooks for senior high school

Alfiana Putri Dewanti, Ikmi Nur Oktavianti

Abstract


Textbooks play the important role since they provide the material sources beneficial for students. However, some textbooks sometimes contain inauthentic materials and there are some words or sentences are barely used in everyday communication. Moreover, modal verbs are also important in teaching and learning process since they are the most problematic grammatical units. This study aims to examine the frequency use of possibility, ability, and permission central modal verbs in conversation sections in Kurikulum Merdeka’s textbooks, comparing with the spoken sub-corpus of COCA. This study uses corpus-based analysis and the research is categorized as descriptive qualitative. The data sources consist of three series of Kurikulum Merdeka’s textbooks for senior high school in Indonesia. The findings reveal that “can” emerges as the most frequently used central modal verbs in both textbooks (79%) and COCA (50%), dominantly expressing a sense of ability in conversation sections of textbooks. Furthermore, “could” occupies the lowest position in conversation sections of textbooks (3%), whereas it ranks as the second most common used in COCA. Hence, “could” is not well presented in the textbooks compared to that in spoken sub-corpus COCA, indicating there is a mismatches in the usage of possibility, ability, and permission central modal verbs between the textbooks and COCA.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Akhofullah, (2023). Central modal verbs in Kurikulum Merdeka’s tetxbooks at senior high school level in Indonesia: A corpus-based analysis.

Akhofullah, & Oktavianti, I. N. (2023). The frequency distribution of central modal verbs in kurikulum merdeka’s textbooks in indonesia: A corpus-based analysis. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 6(6), 1243-1249.

Al-Ghalban, L. A.-A. (2015). A corpus-based study of modal verbs in native and Egyptian learner English. CDELT Occasional Papers in the Development of English Language Education, 59(1) 343-372.

Arellano A, R. (2018). A corpus linguistics application in the analysis of textbooks as national teaching instruments of English as a Second Language in Chile. Actualidades Investigativas En Educación, 18(1), 376–395.

Astuti, P., Anggaira, S. A., Herawati, A., Nurhayati, Y., Dadan, & Suariani, D. (2022). Bahasa Inggris: English for Change (K. A. M. Capa, Ed.). Retrieved from https://buku.kemdikbud.go.id

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G. N., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2021). Grammar of spoken and written English. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.232

Burton, G. (2012). Corpora and coursebooks: Destined to be strangers forever? Corpora, 7(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2012.0019

Charalambous, A. C. (2011). The role and use of course books in EFL. Online Submission. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED524247

Collins, P. (2009). Modals and quasi-modals in English. Rodopi.

Hermawan, B., Haryanti, D., & Suryaningsih, N. (2022). Bahasa Inggris work in progress (M. C. G. Espiritu, Ed.). Pusat Perbukuan Badan Standar, Kurikulum, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Holmes, J. (1988). Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/9.1.21

Laleh, K., & Shokrpour, N. (2015). The “Permission/possibility/ability” modals in Malaysian English textbooks: A corpus-based analysis. Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 18(2), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.5782/2223-2621.2014.18.2.56

Larsen-Freeman, D., Celce-Murcia, M., Frodesen, J., White, B., & Williams, H. A. (2016). The Grammar Book: Form, meaning, and use for English language teachers. National Geographic Learning, Heinle Cengage Learning.

Leech, G. N. (2013). Meaning and the English verb (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835464

Leung, R. C. (2016). A corpus-based analysis of textbooks used in the orientation course for immigrants in Germany: Ideological and pedagogic implications. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 4(3), 154–177.

Li, Q. (2017). A Corpus-based study of modal verbs use in English writing by EFL learners. Canadian Social Science, 13(11), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.3968/9975

Merdianto, A., Hardini, S., Marjenny. (2023). Bahasa Inggris life today. Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang, Kemdikbud.

Mukundan, J., & Khojasteh, L. (2011). Modal auxiliary verbs in prescribed Malaysian English textbooks. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n1p79

Norberg, C., & Nordlund, M. (2018). A corpus-based study of lexis in L2 English textbooks. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(3), 463–473.

Nozawa, Y. (2010). An analysis of the use of modal verbs in EFL textbooks in terms of politeness strategy of English. Waseda University Repository. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/144440561.pdf

Oktavianti, I. N., & Fajria, A. (2021). Modal verbs in a curriculum-based EFL textbook of senior high school in Indonesia: A corpus-based study. TESOL International Journal, 16(5). https://www.tesol-international-journal.com/volume-16-issue-5-2021/

Palmer, F. R. (2014). Modality and the English modals. Routledge.

Perkins, M. R. (1982). The core meanings of the English modals. Journal of Linguistics, 18(2), 245–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700013608

Phoocharoensil, S. (2017). Corpus-based exploration of linking adverbials of result: Discovering what ELT writing coursebooks lack. 3L, Language, Linguistics, Literature, 23(1), 150-167. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/961c/29be4efaac40a44a2e8768e2cf38b8900220.pdf

Quirk, R. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English Language. Longman.

Radić-Bojanić, B., & Topalov, J. (2016). Textbooks in the EFL classroom: Defining, assessing and analyzing. Zbornik Radova Filozofskog Fakulteta u Pristini, 46(4), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrffp46-12094

Sujatna, M. L., Sujatna, E. T. S., & Pamungkas, K. (2019). Exploring the use of modal auxiliary verbs in Corpus of Contemporary of American English (COCA). Sosiohumaniora - Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 21(2), 166-172. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v21i2.19970

Timmis, I. (2015). Corpus linguistics for ELT: Research and practice. Routledge.

Tomlinson, B. (2023). Developing materials for language teaching. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://www.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=aZG_EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Tomlinson,+B.+(2014).+Material+Evaluation.+In+Developing+materials+for+language+teaching&ots=G4gYM0zWuU&sig=EsFjxxr4pW8cSvaZjxANJ5XZJgg

Tyson, H., & Woodward, A. (1989). Why students aren’t learning very much from textbooks. Educational Leadership. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Why-Students-Aren%27t-Learning-Very-Much-from-Tyson-Woodward/36cea212b33f3c7c7ffd0b017d0e44ef4ffce47e




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/iucee2024.v3i1.14586

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Kampus 4 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Jl. Ringroad Selatan, Kragilan, Tamanan, Kec. Banguntapan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55191, Indonesia

Email: iucee@pbi.uad.ac.id