Analysis of teacher perceptions of changes in the English Curriculum K-13 to the Kurikulum Merdeka at SDN 3 Gumul
Abstract
This study examines the perceptions of teachers at SDN 3 Gumul regarding the transition from the 2013 Curriculum (K-13) to Kurikulum Merdeka in English language learning. The research employs a qualitative approach, using structured observations and interviews with two homeroom teachers. The findings highlight the challenges faced by teachers in implementing the new curriculum, including the lack of English language educators and digital media facilities. Despite these challenges, Kurikulum Merdeka offers flexibility and the potential for innovative teaching methods, allowing teachers to adapt their approaches to students’ unique needs and integrate local resources and digital media into the learning process. The study underscores the importance of teacher professionalism and continuous support to ensure the successful implementation of Kurikulum Merdeka. The results provide valuable insights into the impact of curriculum changes on teaching practices and the role of teachers in adapting to new educational policies.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alhamuddin, A. (2014). Sejarah kurikulum di Indonesia (Studi analisis kebijakan pengembangan kurikulum). Nur El-Islam, 1(2), 48-58.
Anwar, R. (2023). Bimbingan klasikal HOTS dan TPACK dalam Kurikulum Merdeka: Suatu pendekatan best practice. Feniks Muda Sejahtera.
Arviansyah, M. R., & Shagena, A. (2022). Efektivitas dan peran guru dalam kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Lentera: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 17(1), 40-50.
Budiningsih, A. (2010). Strategi pembelajaran yang memerdekakan. Majalah Ilmiah Pembelajaran, 6(2), 1-12.
Banegas, D. L. (2016). Exploring perceptions of curriculum change in initial English language teacher education: A case in Argentina. Estudios Sobre Educación, 75-95.
Baro’ah, S. (2020). Kebijakan merdeka belajar sebagai strategi peningkatan mutu pendidikan. Jurnal Tawadhu, 4(1), 1063-1073.
Basturkman, P. L., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2004). Teachers' stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 243-272.
Bekalo, S., & Welford, G. (2000). Practical activity in Ethiopian secondary physical sciences: Implications for policy and practice of the match between the intended and the implemented curriculum. Research Papers in Education, 15(2), 185-212.
Connelly, F. M., & Lantz, O. C. (1991). Definitions of curriculum: An introduction. In A. Lewy (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum (pp. 15-18). New York: Pergamon Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Dubin, E., & Olshtain, E. (1986). Course Design: Developing Programs and Materials for Language Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Faisal, R., Rahman, S. A., & Babo, R. (2023). Persepsi guru terhadap penerapan konsep Merdeka Belajar di sekolah dasar. JUDIKDAS: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 2(3), 137-146.
Hajaroh, S., & Adawiyah, R. (2018). Kesulitan guru dalam mengimplementasikanpenilaian autentik. ẽl-Midad Jurnal Jurusan PGMI, 10(2), 131-152.
Falah, I. F., Apsari, Y., & Kusumah, R. (2023). Teaching English at primary school under Merdeka curriculum: Students' voices. The Proceedings of English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation (ELTLT), 12, 118-124.
Komaruddin, (2001). Ensiklopedia Manajemen (5th ed.). Bumi Aksara.
Lundeberg, M. A., & Levin, B. B. (2003). Prompting the development of preservice teachers’ beliefs through cases, action research, problem-based learning, and technology, in J Raths and A McAninch (eds), Teacher Beliefs and Classroom Performance: The Impact of Teacher Education, Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, pp. 23-42.
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. Pearson Education, Inc.
Moleong, L. J. (2006). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Munandar, A., Hardi, O. S., & Dwi Sukanti, L. (2021). The differences in learning activities by using “RPP Merdeka” and “RPP K-13” for elementary school teachers in Jakarta. Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2020), 532(532), 68–72. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210227.011
Muzharifah, A., Ma’alina, I., Istianah, P., & Lutfiah, Y. N. (2023). Persepsi guru terhadap implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Walisongo Kranji 01 Kedungwuni. Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education, 2(2), 161-184.
Rahayu, R., Rosita, R., Rahayuningsih, Y. S., Hernawan, A. H., & Prihantini, P. (2022). Implementasi kurikulum Merdeka Belajar di sekolah penggerak. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6313-6319.
Richardson, V. (2003). Preservice Teachers’ Beliefs. In J. Raths, & A. R. McAninch (Eds.), Teacher Beliefs and Classroom Performance: The Impact of Teacher Education (pp. 1-22). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Saputri, D. H., Azzahra, D. A., Sari, D. V., Wulan, E. N., & Putri, S. A. (2024). Differences from K-13 curriculum to independent curriculum based on teacher perceptions. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(2), 9-9.
Senior, R. M. (2006). The experience of language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Sumanto. (2014). Psikologi umum. CAPS (Center of Academic Publishing Service).
Wahyudin, A. Y. (2023, November 22). Kurikulum Merdeka dalam pembelajaran bahasa Inggris: Transformasi pendidikan di Indonesia. FSIP Teknokrat. https://fsip.teknokrat.ac.id/penerapan-pembelajaran-bahasa-inggris-dalam-kurikulum-merdeka/
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/iucee2024.v3i1.14640
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Kampus 4 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Jl. Ringroad Selatan, Kragilan, Tamanan, Kec. Banguntapan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55191, Indonesia
Email: iucee@pbi.uad.ac.id